MCP Slack Server
v2025.4.24Anthropic (Archived)
ARCHIVED: Former Anthropic reference MCP server for Slack workspace interaction, archived 2025-05-29 to the servers-archived repository. NO LONGER MAINTAINED and no security guarantees are provided for archived servers. Slack now ships an official Slack MCP server, generally available since 2026-02-17 (announced at Dreamforce October 2025) with expanded tools added 2026-05-13; it is the recommended replacement.
Trust Vector Analysis
Dimension Breakdown
๐Performance & Reliability+
Message delivery success testing
Search quality testing
Rate limiting behavior testing
Event delivery latency testing
Error handling testing
๐ก๏ธSecurity+
Authentication security review
Access boundary testing
Message posting capability testing
Data exposure analysis
Audit capabilities review
๐Privacy & Compliance+
Data exposure analysis
Privacy controls assessment
Enterprise control assessment
Data retention policy review
Compliance framework review
๐๏ธTrust & Transparency+
Documentation completeness review
Operation traceability assessment
Permission clarity assessment
Implementation documentation review
โ๏ธOperational Excellence+
Setup complexity assessment
Uptime analysis
Performance benchmarking
Feature completeness assessment
Cost analysis
- +Powerful team communication and collaboration automation
- +Comprehensive Slack API with rich feature set
- +High reliability and uptime from Slack infrastructure
- +Granular OAuth permission scopes for access control
- +Excellent audit logging for Enterprise Grid customers
- +Real-time message capabilities through Events API
- !Workspace messages exposed to LLM provider APIs
- !No built-in content filtering or PII protection
- !Risk of exposing confidential team communications
- !Rate limits can be restrictive for high-volume operations
- !ARCHIVED 2025-05-29: reference server unmaintained with no security guarantees; use Slack's official MCP server (GA February 2026) instead
- !Compliance challenges when sharing workspace data with third parties
Use Case Ratings
code generation
Useful for posting code snippets and updates, but limited for actual generation
customer support
Excellent for internal support channels and team communication automation
content creation
Good for collaborative content discussions, but not primary use case
data analysis
Useful for analyzing team communication patterns and sentiment
research assistant
Good for searching team knowledge and past discussions
legal compliance
Risk of exposing confidential team communications to LLM providers
healthcare
High risk if PHI discussed in Slack; compliance challenges
financial analysis
Risky for confidential financial discussions; requires careful controls
education
Great for classroom communication and student collaboration
creative writing
Useful for collaborative writing discussions but not primary tool